On Tuesday, 04-03-2025 at 21:05 Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Sat Mar 1, 2025 at 11:50 AM GMT, Frank Guthausen wrote: > > If this questions affects the DFSG, Debian must take a position. The > > obvious elephant in the room is the question whether Firefox can be > > part of the official distribution. The compatibility question between > > Mozilla ToS and DFSG needs to be enlightened by someone with more legal > > expertise than me. > > Simple answer: these (awful) terms apply to *binaries* supplied by > Mozilla, not source. So, Debian is unaffected. It is pleasing to hear this. > -- > Please do not CC me for listmail. > > 👱🏻 Jonathan Dowland > ✎ j...@debian.org > 🔗 https://jmtd.net > >
- Firefox adds a controversial ToS ajz3dee
- Re: Firefox adds a controversial ToS George at Clug
- Re: Firefox adds a controversial ToS John Hasler
- Re: Firefox adds a controversial ToS Paul M. Foster
- Re: Firefox adds a controversial ToS Frank Guthausen
- Re: Firefox adds a controversial ToS Jonathan Dowland
- Re: Firefox adds a controversial ToS George at Clug
- Re: Firefox adds a controversial ToS Richmond
- Re: Firefox adds a controversial To... Jonathan Dowland
- Re: Firefox adds a controversia... Henrik Ahlgren
- Re: Firefox adds a controversia... gene heskett
- Re: Firefox adds a controversia... Joey Hess
- Re: Firefox adds a controve... Greg
- Re: Firefox adds a controve... Richmond
- Re: Firefox adds a controve... Richmond
- Re: Firefox adds a controve... Bret Busby
- Re: Firefox adds a controve... John Hasler