On Sun 23 Feb 2025 at 09:47:41 (-0500), gene heskett wrote: > On 2/23/25 00:00, David Wright wrote: > > On Sat 22 Feb 2025 at 07:29:15 (-0500), gene heskett wrote: > > [ … ] > > > read all that in the drive label. There was a time when seagate made > > > good hard drives. One of my cnc'd machines has a 250G in it, shut off > > > only for new installs, still running wheezy. No reallocated sectors, > > > the last time I looked, at probably 90K+ spinning hours its fine.
> > http://archive.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/smartmontools/ > > > > [ ] smartmontools_5.41+svn3365-1+b1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb > > 2012-02-15 01:05 550K > > [ ] smartmontools_5.41+svn3365-1+b1_kfreebsd-i386.deb > > 2012-02-14 22:21 550K > > [ ] smartmontools_5.41+svn3365-1.debian.tar.gz 2011-06-19 > > 15:48 38K > > [TXT] smartmontools_5.41+svn3365-1.dsc 2011-06-19 15:48 > > 1.5K > > [ ] smartmontools_5.41+svn3365-1_amd64.deb 2011-06-19 16:18 > > 565K > > [ ] smartmontools_5.41+svn3365-1_armel.deb 2011-06-19 16:19 > > 544K > > [ ] smartmontools_5.41+svn3365-1_armhf.deb 2011-12-07 15:16 > > 529K > > [ ] smartmontools_5.41+svn3365-1_i386.deb 2011-06-19 15:48 > > 567K > > [ ] smartmontools_5.41+svn3365-1_ia64.deb 2011-06-19 16:19 > > 682K > > [ ] smartmontools_5.41+svn3365-1_mips.deb 2011-06-19 16:19 > > 567K > > [ ] smartmontools_5.41+svn3365-1_mipsel.deb 2011-06-20 07:34 > > 561K > > [ ] smartmontools_5.41+svn3365-1_powerpc.deb 2011-06-19 > > 16:19 575K > > [ ] smartmontools_5.41+svn3365-1_s390.deb 2011-06-19 16:19 > > 568K > > [ ] smartmontools_5.41+svn3365-1_s390x.deb 2011-12-02 00:15 > > 576K > > [ ] smartmontools_5.41+svn3365-1_sparc.deb 2011-06-19 16:19 > > 567K > > [ ] smartmontools_5.41+svn3365.orig.tar.gz 2011-06-19 15:48 > > 631K (Aside to Gene's fan: the list lacks aarch64, aka arm64, because that architecture was introduced in jessie (8).) > Something seems to have removed it, but it does re-install okay but > I get wildly different, and confusing readings for some things: > > Power_On_hours I think has rolled over at 100000, while head > flying hours is a much much larger figure that doesn't make sense: > > 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 036 Pre-fail > Always - 0 > 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 060 011 000 Old_age > Always - 35517 > 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 020 Old_age > Always - 239 > 240 Head_Flying_Hours 0x0000 100 253 000 Old_age > Offline - 114378h+51m+54.298s Staggering precision there! But as 114378 hours represents about 13 years, that could be a realistic time, don't you think? > I'd assume head flying hours would > closely match POH if a 1 was added in front of POH, but that doesn't fit I've not seen posted a POH line like that before, with 060 and 011 not being identical numbers. But as the Threshold is 000, then both Value and Worst can never be less than that, obviously. But interpreting those particular values really is above my paygrade. Cheers, David.
