Charles Curley [2025-02-20 14:12:10] wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:27:31 +0100
> Yassine Chaouche <a.chaou...@algerian-radio.dz> wrote:
>> >> in order to close as many security holes as possible,
>> > Oh, that's a very charitable way to look at it. 🙂
>> That was my honest opinion but now I feel gullible :)
>> I don't see how the manufacturer could profit from this?
"Profit" might not be the right word, but I think the point of removing
things that aren't indispensable is to reduce resource use. The upside
for end users is that it can improve performance (and/or leave more room
for other things), the upside for the company is that they may be able
to use a cheaper flash memory, thus lowering the production costs.
Stefan
