On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 at 07:12, <to...@tuxteam.de> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 06:10:35PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > > Sorry for any inconvenience. Calling an LVM volume group kvm is > > > a really stupid idea. > > > > > > This creates a > > > /dev/kvm so kvm cannot work. > > Oh, that was clever! > > > > I recently started preferring `/dev/mapper/<VG>-<LV>` over the > > (admittedly) prettier `/dev/<VG>/<LV>`, just because it lets me use TAB > > completion when I can't remember the VG name, but now you've convinced > > me that `/dev/<VG>/<LV>` is evil! > And then there are the lucky idiots like me, who always had /dev/mapper > "because everyone's doing it" (everyone is cryptsetup, in my case, but > hey). I find it helps clarity to name all my VG's as VG<something> and all my LV's as LV<something>.
