Hi, > On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 20:12:09 +0100, Istvan Toth wrote: > > I am attaching the nvidia make.log.I made the fah79 image deb package > > myself. It also included - linux-headers-6.1.119-fah79_6.1.119-1_amd64.deb
Greg Wooledge wrote: > The log is quite large. I'm surprised the mailing list actually allowed > this. I did not get that mail of 20:12:09 +0100 by Istvan Toth. The thread in the archive https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2025/01/threads.html currently shows a hole before your mail of 14:45:14 -0500. The answers to my mails from Istvan Toth are Cc'ed to my address. Possibly you got such a Cc, too. Istvan Toth wrote: > every time it's about newly built packages, because the .config file that I > usually consider to be correct has not been able to compile properly. It would be interesting to know whether a .deb package which causes a good long-running "dpkg -i" does so reproducibly several times. That way you would learn that it is a problem at "make dep-pkg" time (if working once means working always) or a problem at "dpkg -i"-time (if working once is followed by failure next time). (Don't forget to record the output of you "make dep-pkg" runs in a file and to store one which causes immediate "dpkg -i"-failure and one which causes "dpkg -i" success at least once. Differences between those might give a clue why the nvidia code fails in conftest/functions.h.) Have a nice day :) Thomas
