On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 06:56:07PM +0100, piorunz wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Same here, I am on GMX mailbox too, received a warning recently that I > will be unsubscribed forcibly because my e-mail provider GMX rejected > spam Debian list is sending towards me. LOL. Maybe Debian e-mail server > could improve filtering so I don't receive any spam in the first place? > It's so easy to spot this spam, IDK why server is not trained to > recognize typical spam words in these e-mails.
Spam is... difficult [1]. And you can't expect the Debian mailing list server to agree with each and every one and their dog's mail provider's servers on what is spam. There will always bee disagreements. Moreover: mail providers are growing more and more hysterical about rejecting mails. I think it's OK to discuss possible improvements with the listmasters, but one would have to start with realistic premises. And "the list servers should have the same spam criteria as GMX" is not realistic. Cheers [1] especially its last 0.5%. More so when you define "spam" to include the recipient's parameters (which you have to start doing to catch the last 5%). More so when you let the definition to move over time (which you also have to do for those last 5%) -- t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
