Hi, Wesley wrote: > In my memory ReiserFS was a good choice for our application (many small > files).
Yes, that was its main strength. Possibly ext4 can economize on very small files, too. man 1 chattr mentions: "A file with the 'N' attribute set indicates that the file has data stored inline, within the inode itself. It may not be set or reset using chattr(1), although it can be displayed by lsattr(1)." One would have to research how this can be achieved. > Do you anybody still use ReiserFS today? I gave it up 9 years ago when i began to use Debian 8. Meanwhile it is about time to make migration plans: https://www.phoronix.com/news/ReiserFS-Obsolete "As part of updates to the older file-system drivers for Linux 6.6, the ReiserFS file-system is no longer marked as "Supported" but is officially treated as "Obsolete" within the Linux kernel." Have a nice day :) Thomas
