On Friday, 09-08-2024 at 01:49 Felix Miata wrote: > George at Clug composed on 2024-08-08 09:12 (UTC-0400): > > > Wayland does not score well on glmark2, does anyone know why. > # inxi -S > System: > Host: hp945 Kernel: 6.7.12-amd64 arch: x86_64 bits: 64 > Console: pty pts/0 Distro: Debian GNU/Linux trixie/sid > # aptitude search lmark > v glmark2 - > i A glmark2-data - OpenGL (ES) 2.0 benchmark suite -- data file > p glmark2-drm - OpenGL 2.0 benchmark suite > v glmark2-es2 - > p glmark2-es2-drm - OpenGL 2.0 benchmark suite > p glmark2-es2-wayland - OpenGL 2.0 benchmark suite > p glmark2-es2-x11 - OpenGL 2.0 benchmark suite > p glmark2-wayland - OpenGL 2.0 benchmark suite > i glmark2-x11 - OpenGL 2.0 benchmark suite > #
Felix, I do now understand why you posted the above? I do not use inix, so I am not familiar with the program. Maybe the below list of what is installed in the various Debian Bookworm installations I tested on, might help you to explain why Wayland did not score well? In practical usage, that is when playing games, both XFCE and KDE systems seem to be the same performance. Debian Bookworm KDE: $ apt list --installed | grep glmark2 glmark2-data/stable,stable,now 2023.01+dfsg-1 all [installed,automatic] glmark2-wayland/stable,now 2023.01+dfsg-1 amd64 [installed] Debian Bookworm XFCE: $ apt list --installed | grep glmark glmark2-data/stable,now 2023.01+dfsg-1 all [installed,automatic] glmark2-x11/stable,now 2023.01+dfsg-1 amd64 [installed] Debian Bookworm Cinnamon: # apt list --installed | grep glmark2 glmark2-data/stable,now 2023.01+dfsg-1 all [installed,automatic] glmark2-x11/stable,now 2023.01+dfsg-1 amd64 [installed] George > -- > Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion, > based on faith, not based on science. > > Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! > > Felix Miata > > D
