On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 10:37 AM Roberto C. Sánchez <robe...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 10:16:51AM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 9:13 AM Brian <kimh...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > We just ran the latest updates for Debian Buster on one of our DNS > > > servers running bind9 and one of the slave domains is failing with this > > > message: > > > > > > Aug 2 07:05:20 <hostname> named[76759]: transfer of '<domain name>/IN' > > > from <ip address>#53: Transfer status: too many records > > > > > > There are about 1,400 records in that domain which has never posed a > > > problem in the past. > > > > > > We have tried force transfers, purging journal files and nothing seems to > > > work. > > > > > > We rolled back the update to one performed earlier in the month and now > > > everything is working. > > > > > > Anybody have any idea what is going on with this latest update? > > > > I think this might be "bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record" from > > the debian-security mailing list at > > <https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2024/07/msg00003.html>. > > > Which seems unlikely on a system running buster.
Maybe I am mis-parsing things, but the backporting to older Debian versions is discussed, starting with the question, "Would you be willing to backport the configuration of 9.20 so that companies using larger record number per name can still use bind9 with security update?" The first answer appears at <https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2024/07/msg00004.html>. My apologies if I am mis-parsing things. Jeff
