tomas wrote: > Uh -- it was a quote. They aren't supposed to be original.
Spoiler alert: This post contains higher-order originality. I mentioned computing the similarity with a bunch of tests. The result can then be expressed as a string of test results. And what happens next? You guessed it, you run the same algorithm again! Only now asking who has the most original originality test result string! It is happening. Originality turning hyper-original! \o/ -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal
