On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 2:40 PM Richard <rrosn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You really must think of yourself as being the epitome of human creation. > I don't see any use in continuing this nonsense. If you don't have anything > relevant to say, this case is closed for me. > Who are you talking about? There are two people in the reply below. Jeff > Am Di., 14. Mai 2024 um 16:55 Uhr schrieb gene heskett < > ghesk...@shentel.net>: > >> On 5/14/24 10:09, Richard wrote: >> > Just because something isn't an official ISO standard doesn't mean it's >> > not standard behavior. And how it relates to this mailing list? It's >> > called a setting. >> > >> No its not, its your refusal to use the down arrow in your reply editor >> to put your reply after the question. It really is that simple. If your >> choice of email agents cannot do that, its time to switch to an agent >> that can. There are dozens of them. >> >> > Am Di., 14. Mai 2024 um 15:57 Uhr schrieb Loris Bennett >> > <loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de <mailto:loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de>>: >> > >> > Hi Richard, >> > >> > Richard <rrosn...@gmail.com <mailto:rrosn...@gmail.com>> writes: >> > >> > > "Top posting" (writing the answer above the text that's being >> replied >> > > to) is literally industry standard behavior. >> > >> > Can you provide a link to the standard you are referring to? >> > >> > Assuming such a standard exists, how would it apply to this >> newsgroup? >> > >> > [snip (51 lines)] >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > Loris >> >> Cheers, Gene Heskett, CET. >> >
