Dnia 2024-02-23, o godz. 12:40:19 Arno Lehmann <a...@its-lehmann.de> napisał(a):
> On 23.02.24 at 10:33, Mariusz Gronczewski wrote: > > On 22.02.2024 11:19, Ralph Aichinger wrote: > >> Hello! > >> > >> I know this is a loaded topic... > ... > > There is no good reason *why*. It's entirely US political feel-good > > activism > > Statement one above proven. > > ... > > All it does is wastes tens of thousands of people's time once the > > have to fix > > If there's a single person in the world who feels existing > terminology to hurt them, I consider my usage of such terms. So you do nothing all day or ? Because there is always someone that will find something a problem. > If it makes one person feel better, I think I did something good. That's HORRID argument. You can do massive variety of unexcusably bad things with that excuse. "But that person was happy for it" > If it makes others feel worse, I have to balance arguments. Arguments > such as "it was always thus" or "it's too much effort" are not strong > ones. > And that 0.001% that isn't even affected by term want it changed is argument to you why ? > As it happens, I prefer being called "woke" above being rude. > How about "unable to discuss actual topic but throwing useless generalizations in every sentence"? Is that woke or rude ? -- Mariusz Gronczewski (XANi) <xani...@gmail.com> GnuPG: 0xEA8ACE64 https://devrandom.eu
