On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 07:56:16PM -0500, gene heskett wrote: > On 1/20/24 19:03, phoebus phoebus wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > Hm ok, it's all too much guesswork then. > > > > I understand that the lack of detailed information can make it challenging > > to provide precise solutions. > > I believe I have addressed these questions as accurately and honestly as > > possible in my previous response to Greg, while also incorporating the > > information we discussed earlier. > > > > Regards, > > Thierry > > > I might point out in all this hand waving, that no one puts a contract out > for bid, without specifying the performance required to do the job, which we > aren't privileged to see. A description of what it must do, should not be a > copyright probem as its is part and parcel of the "clean room" description > the coders work from.
[...] I must say that the OP's description was sufficiently clear to me to get a rough idea of what I'd do to wrap it in C (OK, the specific escapery would have to be written down and so on, but that's details). Perhaps I've lived for too long in this weird design space. Cheers -- t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
