On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 09:15:27AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 20/12/2023 22:04, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > The key point here is that you don't STORE these human-readable time
> > strings anywhere.  You simply *produce*  them on demand, using the
> > epoch time values that you *do*  store.
> 
> Greg, I agree to almost everything you write, however I believe that text
> timestamp representation is perfectly valid. To be clear, I consider UTC
> formatted time as human readable, despite some people are not comfortable
> with it:
> 
>     date --utc --rfc-3339=seconds
>     2023-12-22 01:38:50+00:00

As long as the time offset is there, you are my guest :-)

Cheers
-- 
t

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to