Hi, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > * It may also be useful to for someone to post a summary email from time to > time to explain long threads.
You did not move the old "to" but rather added a new one during the change from the text in 2023/12/msg00045.html to the new one: > > * It may also be useful to post a summary email from time to time to > > explain long threads. As we are at it, i think the term "for someone" does not add much of information. Do you have in mind future readers of the archive ? Or casual readers who got lost in forth and back ? Or contributors who deviated from the original topic of the thread ? Further: I see a surplus leading blank in the line " and scan it for redundancy, duplicate words and redundancy." Other lines have only two of those blanks. I see an inner double blank in " Any advice given accordingly may be inaccurate but is given in good faith." Have a nice day :) Thomas
