to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 03:32:53PM +0000, fxkl4...@protonmail.com wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Nov 2023, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > > > On 2023-11-10 10:57:21 +0100, Michael wrote: > > >> On Thursday, 9 November 2023 19:08:25 CET, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > >>> No, this is not a normal phenomenon for bookworm upgrades. I've never > > >>> heard of it happening to anyone before. > > >> > > >> i disagree. i had the same problem b/c i also had dropbear installed. > > > > > > It would be interesting to know why dropbear got installed > > > > at sometime in the distance past i thought it would be handy > > my initial ramdisk is set up so i can remotely unlock the filesystems > > Wait a minute: dropbear is supposed to run in the initramfs, while > sshd will be active afterwards, after pivot-root and all that, right? > > Then I don't quite get why they should collide at all.
Because dropbear *can* be run as an ordinary sshd, and some people do. -dsr-
