On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 04:09:16PM -0200, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete Dutra wrote:
> Em Ter, 2004-01-06 às 08:18, Michael B Allen escreveu: 
> > Is 3.0r1 glibc 2.3.
> 
>       Don't remember.  But I guess you will upgrade to GLibC 2.4 when you
> upgrade to testing in order to get Gnome 2.

There's no such thing as glibc 2.4 yet.

> > What surprises can a RH user expect?
> 
>       I guess the biggest hurdles would be the text-mode, no-detection
> installer (do a system inventory first) and the fact that stable is
> obsolete, so one is almost forced to upgrade to testing.

I don't think this last is as true as people keep saying. Stable's quite
usable.

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to