Paul writes: > As regards Synaptic, based on the discussion here, I'm guessing that > whoever is maintaining it has no particular desire to craft a Wayland > version, and that's why it hasn't been done. Still, Debian leadership > could put out a call for volunteers to work on this. It *could* be > done.
Then do it. > But when the various tools resolve dependencies in different ways, we > clearly have a problem. Why? The database is always left in a consistent state. -- John Hasler j...@sugarbit.com Elmwood, WI USA
