Using qemu is out of discussion,because it is very slow. But as I said,bhyve works better than qemu alone.
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 2:44 PM Michael Stone <mst...@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 11:21:45AM +0200, Mario Marietto wrote: > >wait wait. for sure the option should be enabled on the bios,but bhyve > works in > >a different way than kvm,so it works even if my cpu does not have all the > virt. > >parameters respected. Infact kvm does not work on that cpu. But how many > cpus > >there are like mine ? Does Linux feel to cover the gap of an alternative > to > >qemu and kvm ? not sure about xen as an alternative. > > kvm is literally the hardware acceleration piece. If your CPU doesn't > support that, use qemu without kvm and you get exactly the same > experience (just a bit slower). So "linux" "feels" no need to cover the > gap, because there isn't one. > > -- Mario.
