On May 22, 2023, gene heskett wrote:
> On 5/22/23 15:04, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 12:16:09PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> > > On 5/22/23 03:32, Tim Woodall wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 22 May 2023, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > > 
> > > >    number; for (human) display it is subdivided into four 8 bit chunks
> > > > > (called "octets" for obvious reasons), and those octets only can
> > > > > go from 0 to 255 (since 2^8 == 255).
> > > > > 
> > > > Nit, but 2^8 is 256.
> > > > 
> > > > .
> > > The octets count from base 0 Tim.
> > 
> > That's right, but then they go 0 .. 2^8 - 1. 2^8 is still 256, Tim does
> > have a point there :-)
> > 
> I don't see it, 255 is all 8 bits set, 256 is all 8 bits cleared and carry
> set.

In "natural counting", 2^8 is 256.  (1, 2, 3, 4, ... , 256).

However, you're correct in that the 256 possible values for an 8-bit
number in computing are 0-255. (i.e. 0 to (2^8)-1)

-- 
|_|O|_|
|_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1  E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to