On 12 Apr 2023 18:12, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 06:00:25PM +0200, zithro wrote:
On 12 Apr 2023 11:21, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 08:23:23AM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 21:08:51 +0000
"Andrew M.A. Cater" <amaca...@einval.com> wrote:
Hello Andrew,
If you are subscribed to the mailing list and you post, you should see
a copy turn up in your mailing list mails
Unless your email provider is google, or somebody covertly using google.
Now why would you want to do that?
Cheers
To not have to handle issues with security or availability of
an own mail server.
Google's engineers are way better than me ; )
But they don't work for you.
Well, in a sense, yes, and freely ^^
Concerning *security* only, so *not privacy*, I trust them way more than
any random sysadmin in his den, including me (who followed security
courses).
I suggest reading some of Mitnick's books, and how he had fun with
some AT&T servers.
Comparing entire security teams with an enthousiast is ... out of this
world.
What's the problem letting Google or w/e email service reading
emails from a *public* mailing list ?
If you don't understand the problems I think I won't be able to
explain them to you. There's good literature out there.
Ah ah, this answer ... "I know but I'll keep it for myself". Very nice !
BTW, security by obscurity is a delusion.
If only you were less cryptic I could answer.
The mails in my mailbox contain the exact same data as can be found on
"lists.debian.org". They're both mirrors.
So AI training works the same, if that's what you're implying.
