After I got blacklisted on shellworld.net I moved on to panix.com with much dislocation some of which took me a couple years to correct. The blacklisting wasn't done by shellworld.net either. I found out about the blacklisting by looking my shellworld.net address up with google and the one that posted this information did so on gmane.
Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940) . On Sun, 21 Aug 2022, Karen Lewellen wrote: > Well, if we are going to plug services, shellworld is fantastic! > Even under new management service remains profoundly wonderful. > My personal site is hosted here too, with my paying $60 for both accounts. > Not to cast a cloud on Jude's suggestion below, but my personal efforts to > explore Panix were quite reprehensible, hinting that perhaps new clients, > depending on circumstances, may not enjoy comparative service. > Karen > > > > On Sun, 21 Aug 2022, Jude DaShiell wrote: > > > I have had a telnet account with panix.com I think for 8 years and service > > has been excellent. Webmail is also available for those that want it. > > Telnet accounts here cost $100 per year. I chose telnet since I do better > > with cli than gui. > > > > > > Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> "There are four boxes to be used in > > defense of liberty: > > soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." > > -Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940) > > > > . > > > > On Sun, 21 Aug 2022, David Christensen wrote: > > > >> On 8/20/22 23:36, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> I'm having problem with my actuel email provider (the one that goes with > >>> my web hosting plan). It deals badly with mailing list and now has > >>> started to having delivery problem to email hosted by outlook.com . I > >>> believe their email server (SMTP) are being badly flagged. > >>> > >>> As many of you are long term server and TI operator, would you have any > >>> suggestion for a service ? > >>> > >>> I don't want to pay a huge fee as I don't send much email. Maybe 10-20 > >>> per day at most. > >>> > >>> I was looking on Postmark because it seems to have a good delivery > >>> ranking. > >>> > >>> I'd like a good email provider, as I ain't sure this (Postmark) will fix > >>> all my delivery problem. Would it be better to get a paying plain with > >>> Protonmail, who do offer a plan with IMAP/SMTP ? > >>> > >>> Thanks > >> > >> > >> I have had a domain host plan (DNS, WWW, mail, shell) with Hurricane > >> Electric > >> for 20 years or so, and am pleased with their service: > >> > >> he.net > >> > >> > >> David > >> > >> > >> > > > > > >
