Hi, On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 7:55 PM Greg Wooledge <g...@wooledge.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 07:46:43PM -0500, Igor Korot wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 7:28 PM Greg Wooledge <g...@wooledge.org> wrote: > > > Can you show us the linker command that you ran, and its error message? > > > > This is the command generated on Gentoo: > > How is that relevant to DEBIAN?
Because I'm comparing the output of 2 "-config" files. I sent the output the Debian generated. Sorry for the delay. Debian is set on the VM. > > > [code] > > /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. > > -I/home/igor/dbhandler/libodbc -I.. -I../../dbinterface -DUNICODE > > -DUNIXODBC -I`odbc_config --cflags` -g -O0 -MT > [...] > > That's all noise as far as Debian is concerned. > > > with the following Makefile.am: > > > > [code] > > ## Process this file with automake to produce Makefile.in > > > > > > lib_LTLIBRARIES = \ > > libodbc_lib.la > > > > libodbc_lib_la_SOURCES = \ > > database_odbc.cpp \ > > database_odbc.h > > > > libodbc_lib_la_CXXFLAGS = -I../../dbinterface \ > > -DUNICODE \ > > -DUNIXODBC \ > > -I`odbc_config \ > > --cflags` > > > > libodbc_lib_la_LDFLAGS = -L../dbinterface \ > > -ldbinterface \ > > `odbc_config \ > > --libs` \ > > -lodbcinst > > [/code] > > It looks like you've made some false assumptions about this library. > Apparently it has different linker options and library filenames on > different platforms, and moreover, different *means of learning those > names*. Don't make any presumption. Just check what Debian is generating. > > Sounds like a real bitch to work with. Oh right, it's ODBC, so it's > always going to be horrible, isn't it. Why? It's still going to be libodbc.so and libodbcinst.so, isn't it? Thank you. > > Good luck! >
