It has a serial connector, so I can get LIRC running again. I start studying my self programmed LIRC powered remote control system back to use.
[LIRC is the tool for re-use my old self-programmed TV remote controls Always handy, a free tool to be able to get more remote controls in the house, keep my old self programmed remote controls in use again - the old ones are more reliable - and it is good to protect the environment] Arne On Sun, 5 Jun 2022 08:07:14 +0200 "sp...@caiway.net" <sp...@caiway.net> wrote: > Thanks for the reminder > > I have a still spare thin client free for testing. > > I could use this one for learning bug-fixing. > > I'll start reading the mailing lists more carefully. > > > Arne > > On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:11:50 +0100 > Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@vinc17.net> wrote: > > > On 2022-01-15 18:33:23 +0100, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > On Vi, 14 ian 22, 15:37:21, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 10:56:19AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > > > So clang-13 1:13.0.1~+rc1-1~exp4 testing is in testing/unstable, > > > > > but the changelog says: > > > > > > > > > > llvm-toolchain-13 (1:13.0.1~+rc1-1~exp4) experimental; urgency=medium > > > > > > > > Because despite what the changelog or the version string say, the > > > > maintainer uploaded that version to unstable: > > > > > > > > https://tracker.debian.org/news/1293514/accepted-llvm-toolchain-13-11301rc1-1exp4-source-into-unstable/ > > > > > > In this particular case yes, though as far as I know it's possible that > > > a Maintainer re-uploads the same package to unstable after it's been > > > uploaded to experimental first. > > > > Thanks. I think I'll have to rely on what "apt-show-versions -a" > > says to be sure that it has really been in unstable. > > >
