On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 08:57:51PM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote: > Nano Nano([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > Question to all: I literally specify that you need automake 1.7 and > > autoconf 2.50: is that wise? > > I wondered about. I am running testing and have automake 1.4-p6-2, > which is the latest version for testing/unstable, or so apt-get tells > me. The ./proj fails because its looking for aclocal-1.7. The latest > automake has aclocal-1.4. > > I won't go out to find an automake thats not a debian packgage, but > thats me. >
I'm running SID. I expect you can edit the AMVER and ACVER in proj and/or proj.c to the version numbers you have and it will work. (proj is generated by running "gcc proj.c; ./a.out".) But when I post 0.2 that has the automake;autoconf step already run, I expect you won't have to have the matching automake/autoconf installed; you'll just run ./configure. I'll take a bit of time and make the README halfway decent, because I'll need to document schema.xml before you can use it at all. Hang tight, and thanks for your eyes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
