Note also that sarge currently does NOT have a useful security repository. All security updates for testing need to go through sid first, so there is a not insignificant delay before they are apt-getable for testing...
Most of the time that isn't too much of a problem as "apt-get source" from unstable usually works if you add deb-src lines for unstable in your source.list .
Duly noted; thanks.
So now that I've changed stable to sarge in my sources list, and ran apt-get dist-upgrade and got all the new packages, is it correct now to say "I'm running sarge"? Or is it like half-sarge, half-woody?
-Anthony http://nodivisions.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
