On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 09:41:32 -0600, Nathan Eric Norman wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 03:35:28PM -0800, Nunya wrote:
>> 
>> All I want to do is (1) listen to internet radio, if its blocked and
>> (2) do my ordinary, noncriminal private things that everyone does at
>> work anyway truly in private.
> 
> I was feeling some empathy for you until you mentioned internet radio.
> Why should your employer have to pay for your bandwidth to listen to
> internet radio?  Not every business has huge links to the Internet, and
> many have very small WAN links connecting offices.  Is this ideal? Of
> course not, but people like you who abuse the network _do not help_. 
> Requests for more bandwidth are turned down with the response "Well,
> last week you caught that Tom guy using internet radio.  If we cut down
> on the abuse we'd have plenty of bandwidth!"
> 
> Never underestimate the ability of management to avoid technical
> arguments when faced with the prospect of saving money.
> 

Even with huge internet links, radio is a problem.  My corp has upwards of
50,000 PCs, you can imagine the problem and associated cost if rules
weren't strict and the penalties non-trivial ("not excluding termination")

If you're at work, and you're stealing your company resources (or your
time for which your company has paid you) for personal reasons, you're a
thief, no two ways about it.

-- 
....................paul

It's working as coded.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to