On Mon, Nov 29, 2021, 5:14 PM James H. H. Lampert <jam...@touchtonecorp.com> wrote:
> .... And the only > reason ROOT access is more dangerous than, say, QSECOFR access on OS/400 > (or whatever IBM is calling it this week) is because there's nothing > stopping a Linux ROOT from doing things *nobody* should be allowed to do > without putting the system into some kind of maintenance mode. > Well selinux stops root from doing those things. But im the only known human who doesn't dislike selinux. And other problems I have.... :-D > ....... > -- > JHHL > >
