Yeah, not quite. I was already aware, that https won't improve security much.
I just wondered, why the docu once is telling "use https" and once "http". If only using https or either http, this would not create confuseness. Looks like I am too critical. am I not? :) Best regards Hans > Does > > https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/90227/why-is-there-no-https-transp > ort-for-debian-apt-tool > > address your query?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
