On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 06:49:13PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > Hi, > > On 2021-08-06 5:08 p.m., Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 11:48:46PM +0300, Gunnar Gervin wrote: > >> Didier, > >> most certainly you cannot prove > > > > Wow. You really are a horrible person, aren't you. > > > > And so, another person goes into my kill file. > > > Showing a random passport doesn't show much, except maybe that you ain't > the rightful owner of this passport.
I didn't even open the URL they gave. I didn't care what it was, really. They were accused of using multiple (phony) personas on a mailing list, and how did they respond? Not "you're wrong", but "you can't prove it". To me, that's a tacit ADMISSION of guilt. As in, "Ha ha, look at how clever I am, I fooled you all, and I'm getting away with it!" Well, this is not a court of law. We do not have to PROVE that someone has acted with malice. If you even simply pretend to be a malicious person, that's more than enough to get yourself ignored. Earlier, I gave them the benefit of the doubt, and said that there wasn't enough evidence that they were trolling us. As it turns out, I was wrong. That happens.
