On Jo, 24 iun 21, 14:13:42, Dan Ritter wrote: > > At the other end is anything where you can't use a client or a > server that isn't produced/managed by the central authority. > Despite Signal making some of their source available, you can't > write your own Signal client and have it talk to their official > servers.
Sure, and I don't remember disputing this. But let's not conflate the Signal software (client, server, etc.), the Signal protocol and the Signal *service*. Could you elaborate on why in your opinion an entity providing a service should automatically accept connections from third-party clients and/or federate with other service providers? https://github.com/LibreSignal/LibreSignal/issues/37#issuecomment-217231557 (as is implied from that, Signal did at some point federate) Or could you explain why Matrix (which as far as I know is already both federated and open to any client) is not enough? Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
