On Jo, 18 mar 21, 09:28:06, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > So while I don't doubt that the WA client *could* *in principle* > do end-to-end encryption, they'll do whatever it takes to trick > end users to share their juicy data with the mothership, FB. It's > their life-blood.
I'm guessing the full list of contacts as well as all metadata is already very useful for Facebook. > Should they need help with that "tricking users to do silly things" > part, the mothership, FB, has expertise on that. > > So if you do everything right, if you only communicate with a tight > knit group, if you check all the other's keys, yadda, yadda -- then > it'll possibly work (there are enough mentions of embarrasing bugs > on that Wikipedia page to underscore the "possibly" part, though). Yeah... > But then you could do as well mail/gpg. The user interface is, at > least better, and the most egregious bugs might be shaken out by > now. What (mobile) mail clients does your definition of "better" include (assuming they even support GPG/MIME)? Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
