On Ma, 15 dec 20, 11:47:49, deloptes wrote: > > Hi Andrei, > thank you for posting on this very important topic. > > I want to share my experience and view hoping that you draw some useful > conclusions and we can keep i386 in some way available.
Sorry, should have been more explicit: I'm just the messenger here, assuming that most debian-user subscribers are probably not following debian-devel. In my opinion the most important message is this: > > What's perhaps more significant is that i386 is now getting to the point > > where it requires such prodding, instead of being an assumed default > > architecture. That means that the folks who care about it should probably > > start thinking about building more organization and structure around the > > work, recruiting people, building a task list, and so forth, instead of > > just assuming "oh, everything will work on i386, it always has." > > Volunteering to do that sort of coordination is helpful even if you aren't > > debugging FTBFS problems. That is, if you and other list subscribers care about continued i386 support you should probably look into contributing. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
