On 2020-06-20 at 13:33, deloptes wrote: > (by logic and ontology there is either P or not P that can be true). > If you consider LGBT to be normal, then all the rest is considered as > not normal or vv.
By this same reasoning: * If you consider white to be normal, then all the rest (e.g., black) is considered to be not normal. * If you consider male to be normal, then all the rest (e.g., female) is considered to be not normal. * If you consider right-handed to be normal, then all the rest (e.g., left-handed) is considered to be not normal. In reality, of course, in each of those cases there are multiple distinguishable things which all fall within the range of what is considered "normal". There is no inherent reason why the same could not apply to the context you cite. -- The Wanderer The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
