Hi, 13 juin 2020 à 21:05 de recovery...@enotuniq.net:
> Hi. > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 09:01:59PM +0200, l0f...@tuta.io wrote: > >> 13 juin 2020 à 17:12 de recovery...@enotuniq.net: >> >> > On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 06:10:15PM +0300, Reco wrote: >> > >> >> Let's see. >> >> >> >> >From what I saw this should fail DKIM test. >> >> >> >> And, for the good measure: >> >> >> >> >From: this is not a valid RFC-822 header >> >> >> > >> > Ok, clearly I don't have any problem with DKIM on this list. >> > >> Ok let's see for me as well: >> >> >From my point of view >> >> >From: l0f4r0 >> >> l0f4r0 >> > Your e-mail passed DKIM test on my MTA with flying colors. > > Try that base64-encoded html thing next. > It was already base64 encoded, see below: --------------79Bu5A16qPEYcVIZL@tutanota Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: base64 PGRpdj4xMyBqdWluIDIwMjAgw6AgMTc6MTIgZGUgcmVjb3ZlcnltNG5AZW5vdHVuaXEubmV0Ojxicj 48L2Rpdj48YmxvY2txdW90ZSBjbGFzcz0idHV0YW5vdGFfcXVvdGUiPjxkaXY+T24gU2F0LCBKdW4g MTMsIDIwMjAgYXQgMDY6MTA6MTVQTSArMDMwMCwgUmVjbyB3cm90ZTo8YnI+PC9kaXY+PGJsb2NrcX VvdGU+PGRpdj5MZXQncyBzZWUuPGJyPjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+PGJyPjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+Jmd0O0Zyb20g d2hhdCBJIHNhdyB0aGlzIHNob3VsZCBmYWlsIERLSU0gdGVzdC48YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj48YnI+PC 9kaXY+PGRpdj5BbmQsIGZvciB0aGUgZ29vZCBtZWFzdXJlOjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pjxicj48L2Rp dj48ZGl2PiZndDtGcm9tOiB0aGlzIGlzIG5vdCBhIHZhbGlkIFJGQy04MjIgaGVhZGVyPGJyPjwvZG l2PjwvYmxvY2txdW90ZT48ZGl2Pjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pk9rLCBjbGVhcmx5IEkgZG9uJ3QgaGF2 ZSBhbnkgcHJvYmxlbSB3aXRoIERLSU0gb24gdGhpcyBsaXN0Ljxicj48L2Rpdj48L2Jsb2NrcXVvdG U+PGRpdj5PayBsZXQncyBzZWUgZm9yIG1lIGFzIHdlbGw6PGJyPjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+PGJyPjwvZGl2 PjxkaXY+Jmd0O0Zyb20gbXkgcG9pbnQgb2Ygdmlldzxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZG l2PiZndDtGcm9tOiBsMGY0cjA8YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj48YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj5sMGY0cjA8YnI+ PC9kaXY+ --------------79Bu5A16qPEYcVIZL@tutanota-- l0f4r0
