The Wanderer (12020-06-09): > I subscribe to probably dozens of mailing lists, and I don't know of any > way to configure things to add that header with a proper value > automatically on a per-mailing-list basis. Otherwise, I'd probably have > done this years ago, unless other considerations (e.g., UI for when I > want to do this vs. when I really do want to reply to the sender or to > all recipients) took precedence.
With Mutt, I use this: send-hook ~cdebian-u...@lists.debian.org my_hdr "Reply-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org" There is certainly an extension to Mozilla to do the same thing with a few dozen clics. > For myself, I use the "Reply to List" button in (a now-old version of) > Thunderbird, and avoid the issue of Reply-To settings entirely unless I > actually do want to reply to something other than just the list. That means you need to remember and take notice, each time you reply to a mail, whether you are replying to a list or not. I personally reject any solution with that requirement, since there are solutions without. > While I wouldn't necessarily take the argument as far as you appear to, > I am inclined to agree in principle. > > That said, while this is an important aspect of the situation, it's > technically a tangent from the question of whether people other than the > developers can build the program and have the result be usable. If we > assume that the developers don't routinely update or replace these > prebuilt objects, and don't hack these objects themselves as part of > working on the project, then the tree we have is the tree the developers > build from - and if we can build a working program from it, then that > narrower question is answered "yes". These thoughts caused me to consider an even scarier hypothesis: It's entirely possible that the authors of Jitsi themselves would not be able to build it from sources. > I just don't care to bother with doing that myself at present. Which, to > an extent, turns things back to Tomas' point. Tomas's point is "give the benefit of the doubt", but at this point there is not much doubt left. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
