Ihor Antonov wrote: > As a former Arch user I second that opinion. The wiki is better > structured, has better contents and is easy to edit anyway. Archlinux wiki > is the primary, if not the only, source of the documentation, so all the > effort is concentrated there. >
I can second that - for general Linux question I use very often the arch wiki. For Debian usually google & co give the right page, but very often as mentioned structure or content is not that good or contemporary.
