On Du, 19 apr 20, 13:27:40, Sven Hartge wrote: > Andrei POPESCU <andreimpope...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Ah, I see. I was betting on "forwarding", but later it occurred to me > >> that this would wrap the original message (probably without headers > >> :-( into a part of a multi-part MIME. Drats. Probably you are right. > > > As far as I know "forwarding as attachment" does not affect the > > original message (though this may depend on the client), however it is > > *not* appropriate for this particular use-case. I'm guessing because > > it would be difficult to distinguish the forwarded message from other > > (legitimate) mime parts. > > No, because wrapped messages are of "Content-Type: message/rfc822". If > your wrap multiple messages, all are contained in "Content-Type: > multipart/digest", so they are easily distinguishable from other > attachments.
I stand corrected. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
