On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 19:35:58 +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 07:48:26AM -0600, Hoyt Bailey wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "David Palmer." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 23:16 > > Subject: Re: Easing the load. > > > > > > > On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 09:16:24 -0500 > > > Paul Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 20:50:15 +0800, David Palmer wrote: > > > > I think the solution to the "server down, need answer NOW" issue > > > > is: > > > > > > > > 1. Ask on the #debian IRC channel > > > > 2. Get better at refining Google searches. > > > > 3. Use professional support services. > > > > > I agree with David if the posting dosent reflect a Tech. approch to > > the subject then it shouldnt be on this list. > > Hoyt > > > > > so your post here shouldn't actually be on the list? > > > i mean, technically speaking, it's hardly reflective of a technical > approach to the subject to merely announce your agreement with the > previous post, is it? > > as for david's 3 points, though i'm sure he means well, i would be > very disappointed to see anyone receive those as a response to a > genuine query on this list. while independent inititiative is well > recommended, the latent discouragement in that response is not > reflective of this community and would do it no positive service > whatsoever. > > ben
Thank you, Ben, but that is actually an incorrect attribution that you are referring to. These three points were all the recourse that Paul Morgan was prepared to concede to a Debian sys. admin in trouble. The point I made in the original post was in accord with your statement with the endorsement of the community factor. Regards, David. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
