This all dates from the days when 1) you might actually need swap to
complete an install and 2) swap was utilized by partition name and
not a UUID. It's reasonable to wonder if the installer still needs to be
so aggressive about swap space. There's a bug (842409) dating from 2016
regarding this topic, which was opened with severity minor and hasn't
gotten any commentary since then. Another (905793) got a few comments
but nothing in more than a year. Perhaps some discussion sent to the
BTS about alternate behaviors would be useful, rather than just rants
that "something" is "broken"?
- Debian Graphical Installer: why does it format swap? Clod Turner
- Re: Debian Graphical Installer: why does it format s... Pascal Hambourg
- Re: Debian Graphical Installer: why does it format s... Felix Miata
- Re: Debian Graphical Installer: why does it form... David Wright
- Re: Debian Graphical Installer: why does it format s... Joe
- Re: Debian Graphical Installer: why does it format s... Peter Ehlert
- Re: Debian Graphical Installer: why does it format s... ct
- Re: Debian Graphical Installer: why does it form... Peter Ehlert
- Re: Debian Graphical Installer: why does it ... Michael Stone
- Re: Debian Graphical Installer: why does... Linux-Fan
- Re: Debian Graphical Installer: why... David Wright
- Re: Debian Graphical Installer: why... Andrei POPESCU
- Re: Debian Graphical Installer: why does it form... Jude DaShiell
- Re: Debian Graphical Installer: why does it ... Felix Miata
- Re: Debian Graphical Installer: why does it form... Jonathan Dowland