This all dates from the days when 1) you might actually need swap to complete an install and 2) swap was utilized by partition name and not a UUID. It's reasonable to wonder if the installer still needs to be so aggressive about swap space. There's a bug (842409) dating from 2016 regarding this topic, which was opened with severity minor and hasn't gotten any commentary since then. Another (905793) got a few comments but nothing in more than a year. Perhaps some discussion sent to the BTS about alternate behaviors would be useful, rather than just rants that "something" is "broken"?

Reply via email to