On 1/4/2020 6:12 PM, Steve Kemp wrote: >> As far as I can tell, Mutt uses the ncurses interface > > Yes. > >> Can I use Mutt without ncurses? > > No. > >> If no, is my only alternative Sup/Notmuch? > > https://aerc-mail.org/ is new, and golang-based. No ncurses. > > Though it has to be said it seems like an odd-requirement, > is there a specific reason to avoid ncurses? > >> If I use Sup or Notmuch I also need to configure IMAP and SMTP access, >> is there a MUA which does IMAP SMTP that does not rely on ncurses? > > On that I have no idea; I wrote a console-based mail-client, > inspired by mutt but using Lua for UI/scripting, but I just > exec "/usr/sbin/sendmail .." for outgoing mail, and that's a > pretty common approach. <https://github.com/lumail/lumail/> >
Yes there is, I connect to a VM using SSH and my Windows screenreader does not like curses interface and maybe .other interface(s) as well Regarding Alpine/re-alpine, it is somewhat better accessible then Mutt but far from usable at first glance. Regarding gnus, is only for emax, if I'm not mistaking and I'm a vim user! :) Regarding "mail", I'll look into that, thanks to...@tuxteam.de. My goal in all of this is to move away from Enigmail/Thunderbird for the following reasons: - Thunderbird moving from enigmail to use his own GPG implementation - Using GPG with multiple signing subkies Sendmail/msmtp could do what I want, I'll look into that. Thanks to Jonathan Dowland <j...@dow.land> for Mutt and 'slang'. Thanks to Reco <recovery...@enotuniq.net> for his input. Thanks to anyone else for their input. -- John Doe