On Mon 16 Dec 2019 at 10:53:02 (-0500), Jape Person wrote:
> On 12/16/19 12:42 AM, David Wright wrote:
> > On Sat 14 Dec 2019 at 13:49:25 (-0500), Jape Person wrote:
> > > On 12/14/19 1:24 AM, john doe wrote:
> ...
> > > > The file '/etc/resolv.conf' should let you know what TLD is sent from
> > > > the DHCP server.
> > > > 
> > > > Debian shouldn't modify your configuration files '/etc' without your 
> > > > nolage.
> > 
> > Depending on the packages chosen, /etc/resolv.conf is one file in /etc
> > that is modified by Debian. The resolvconf package lists 23 other
> > programs that it is designed to adjudicate between, for want of a
> > better term.
> > 
> ...
> 
> That has been my understanding, and it's why I never edit /etc/resolv.conf 
> myself.
> 
> > > > Note that the TLD '.lan' is sometime used.
> > 
> > That's another choice, like .local, that could always be issued as a
> > real TLD at some point in the future.
> > 
> > > > 1)  
> > > > https://www.xfinity.com/support/articles/list-of-approved-cable-modems
> > > 
> > > I'm using my own router behind the modem provided by the ISP. I've
> > > never used a router provided by an ISP for controlling my network.
> > > 
> > > I'm using a Luxul XWR-1750 which has been kept on the latest firmware
> > > available. Last upgrade was done early this year, long before the
> > > noted change in names.
> > > 
> > > The router is set to provide static IP addresses and has the names of
> > > each of the systems associated with their MAC Addresses and IP
> > > Addresses.
> > 
> > Can you just clarify this? My router provides static IP addresses on
> > the basis of the MAC addresses, all the information being typed in¹
> > by me. It also lists the names of the other hosts, but only because
> > those hosts told it their names. IOW the router (cheap, $35) doesn't
> > issue hostnames, nor provide a DNS service itself. It also neither
> > knows nor cares what the domain name of the network is.
> > 
> > How much of this is the same on the router in your network?
> > 
> > ¹ actually, of course, it deduces all but the last number in the
> > dotted quad.
> 
> Yes, it's my understanding that my router does provide DNS on the
> local network and will provide the 208.67.222.222, 208.67.220.220
> OpenDNS servers or whatever the ISP provides for DNS servers,
> depending upon entries made in its setup pages. I do not think that it
> actually issues the hostnames, but it does detect whatever hostnames
> the devices provide and shows them associated with the IP addresses
> its DHCP server issues in a table. Do you think that I'm
> misunderstanding the arrangement? Could well be. I have ASSumed that
> it worked this way from the appearance of the tables in the setup
> software.
> 
> The software running the router is licensed under Luxul Open Source Code for 
> Programmers (GPL).

Others will have to comment on the functionality provided by this
software as I'm not familiar with it.

But a table of names doesn't convince me that your router is providing
a DNS service (or a domain name). My router maintains a list of names,
but they're not strictly hostnames unless I edit them to be so. For
example, when we bought our last Roku¹, it told the router it was
called "ROKU PREMIEREPLUS - 964" which I edited to "rokupw²", the name
by which I can ping it if I want to know whether it's powered up.

Try typing
$ nslookup chip-nuc 192.168.1.1
where 192.168.1.1 is the IP address for *your* router.

¹ a TV streamer. ² and "rokupe" for its ethernet interface.

Cheers,
David.

Reply via email to