-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Brian wrote: > On Thu 14 Nov 2019 at 11:12:38 -0000, Dan Purgert wrote: >> Sorting by "newest" on their (laser / color led) models listing results >> in the "HL-L3270CDW" being listed as "newest" -- digging around, it >> seems that it's a 2018 model. Still has LPR/LPD listed under the >> "Protocols" sections (both IPv4 and v6, actually). >> >> I would expect that pretty much everything of theirs (well, at least in >> terms of "business lineup") would then still support it. Their site >> seems a bit broken right now (or perhaps it's on my end), so I can't get >> at the 'home' stuff to check. > > One would think that a business machine supporting the LPD protocol > would cost a vendor pennies. After all, the vendor doesn't have to > do much when they already have the code to put in their firmware.
Yup, if that. > > What is more interesting is why a user thinks that the LPD protocol > gives them something that IPP doesn't. Who said that LPR/LPD gave people "something" that IPP doesn't? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAl3N6NYACgkQjhHd8xJ5 ooGr7ggAlTy7whKBgKxJORrjavO2+GmJWPp9Zsaei64Vwrm0SEJ2Wor5pa0FbleO kZXVVVfzXiy9ZWbqhEkR7SZ5zK1Qb8kweluhtYh44sPtkCCwcJi762pJvVqh5wmw RozqqgFcRNKrnfANJohBU2IdA7qH+QjgRkPS92OhquwqXSZydMD84Zr3+dpHW8L7 KrSpYdnfMQxkQlnEtECRX1NCKMpUZRpkaTOMW0fxOBkgmbvt2Up62Aobay+THmAG cTKJjMnxN88e15HfAUebXyVBHyj87sQK/q1BUROKQnJaC+pgT1eEubdLI7cnvpQ4 L4O7/yS7IONX0xZr5p2+oAFcdT8gBg== =HHT2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- |_|O|_| |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
