Hi, Reco wrote: > > 1) Call me old-fashioned, but posters' personalities should not matter > > here, at this list. [...] > > The language OP is using could definitely use some improvement indeed,
It would serve the general issue of constructive discussion. > > discussing OP's personality just because of that is as low as it gets. I made up my own theories but refrained from posting them, although i am now sad about the consequential waste of bad pun and fake commiseration. > > PS Just a friendly reminder. Please check for the existence of that > > LDOSUBSCRIBER value of X-Spam-Status e-mail header *before* replying to > > e-mail. Brian wrote: > The non-existence of LDOSUBSCRIBER in a mails's headers says nothing > definite about whether the poster is subscribed to the list or reads > list mails. To my best knowledge, "X-Spam-Status: ... tests=...,LDOSUBSCRIBER,..." says that the "From:" address of the mail is subscribed. If this sign is missing, the person-like entity which wrote the mail could still be subscribed by another address or other means. Nevertheless, if i have no other indication then i normally add a "Cc:" to the thread starter if i do not see LDOSUBSCRIBER among the spam tests. > > Unless, of course, you intention is *not* to reply to OP but > > have your reply visible to the list. ... which in this case is indeed my intention because i have nothing useful to say about the OP's original problem. Have a nice day :) Thomas
