On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 3:08 AM Steve McIntyre <93...@debian.org> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 12:00:11AM +0300, goleo . wrote: > >On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 10:49 PM Steve McIntyre <93...@debian.org> wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 06, 2019 at 09:50:54PM +0300, goleo . wrote: > >> >Hi. > >> > > >> >After installing Debian 10 on my laptop (I choose desktop LXQT) > >> >I noticed that Xarchiver is preinstalled and it was inconvenient > >> >to me in the past, so I opened Synaptic to remove it. But when > >> >I click on "xarchiver" and choose "Mark for Removal" or > >> >"Mark for Complete Removal" it says it'll install Ark, > >> >KDE 5 Frameworks and GNUSTEP. > >> > > >> >Here is the video proof: > >> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1IoGQP1omE > >> > >> I don't see any harassment here. Can you explain what you think might > > > >This is harassment because you force me to use either > >Xarchiver or Ark, you don't give me the choice to use none. > >(Actually I wanted to install PeaZip which you don't provide > >as a package, so why would I want to keep Xarchiver?) > > > >All normal package managers would just remove everything > >that depends on Xarchiver, not force me to install alternative. > > > >You are a bunch of hypocrites and assholes, you are not > >fighting for freedom, you just provide separate contrib and > >non-free repositories just to make up illusion of fighting fighting > >for freedom. > > > >If you really fought for freedom, I would have a freedom to > >just remove what I don't like (Xarchiver) and everything that > >depends on it (as long as it's not an optional dependency). > > Two points: > > 1. If you don't like the dependencies in the packaging system, there > are multiple better ways to deal with this. File bugs, or work > around this with tools like equivs. Ranting about imagined > "harassment" here is not gaining you anything. >
Wow, that's a really retarded response. That's not a bug because you intentionally harass everyone by forcing to install X when someone removes Y. Asshole. > 2. Being instantly abusive is a great way to lose any sympathy people > might have for you. - you're asking people to write off any valid > points you might have and ignore you in future. > Liar, you are the one being abusive. I am being rude for a right reason. > This is the end of the discussion here for me. > > -- > Steve McIntyre 93...@debian.org > Debian Community Team commun...@debian.org >
