> It now seems to be established that putting Open Source software up on
> a public server is protected speech. Exporting copies of closed source
> proprietary software, however, is not. This means that Microsoft has to
> avoid knowingly exporting restricted material to certain countries.
My understanding is that export of *source code* is allowed, whereas
export of *executable code* is at risk. And Free Software squeezes
in-between because someone was sane enough to realize that whether
`make` is run before exporting or after exporting doesn't make any
difference to the end result.
Stefan
