On Ma, 09 iul 19, 18:19:22, David Wright wrote: > On Tue 09 Jul 2019 at 10:50:01 (+0300), Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > > I'm interested if the more recent kernel still uses ethX for the > > wireless interface. > > Yes, with net.ifnames=0 I still get eth0 and eth1. I ran both options > and printed debian_version, ip l, and dmesg. The last is rather large > to post, so I stripped the [timing] information and then ran a unified > diff on them. Then, allowing for the mixed-up ordering, I cut all the > lines where the difference was just the memory addresses, and then > all the common stuff that was about irrelevant subsystems. > > See attached, but if you really want it all, I can send it offlist.
Yes, please. > +ipw2200 0000:02:04.0 wlp2s4: renamed from eth0 Unless I'm misremembering my adapter that came up as ethX was also an ipw2200. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
