On 2019-07-02 at 09:10, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 08:51:10AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote: > >> On 2019-07-02 at 08:37, Curt wrote: >> >>> Not even that, it seems (no longer affects systemd). >> >> Have you confirmed that? > > I'm using systemd, and the 70-* file was used when I upgraded to > buster, but that was roughly 2 months ago. I haven't tested on > current buster.
It would be worth trying, although I'm not currently in a position to easily put together a testbed machine (or VM) for this purpose. >> It seems possible that on a systemd machine, things in other >> packages (such as whatever would provide that 99-default.link file, >> which unfortunately - because it's under /etc/ - can't be easily >> found through 'apt-file search') might still be overriding >> 70-persistent-net.rules, even with this change reverted. > > wooledg:~$ locate 99-default > /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link > > wooledg:~$ dpkg -S 99-default > udev: /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link Hmm. Apparently I didn't search for the right thing; I just used the full explicit path, including /etc/, which found nothing. I'm guessing this is a case where the systemd pattern of having config files under /lib/ and symlinking them from under /etc/ is in use, and that one of /etc/systemd, /etc/systemd/network/, and /etc/systemd/network/99-default.link is a symlink. /etc/systemd/network/ doesn't appear on my system, but 99-default.link does exist under /lib, with the same contents as you gave from yours. -- The Wanderer The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
