> You mean *your* old files or those coming with *new* Debian packages? Here I mean *new* Debian packages. What I want to say is this: Upgrading to a new package version should not destroy the system or force the admin to edit many configurations manually.
When it was decided to use new names, then ALL related packages should be adapted to the new style. If it is not done, this is a bug. More over, IMO it is a critical release bug. For a new release I expect those things fixed. It is a thing of quality. My intention was, to point to a problem, which for me, that no one cared and which was noticed by nobody. To say: "We don't care, just go back to the old style or file a bug for every package" is easy. On the other hand: I do not care for new installations, I care for existing installations. I do not care for my few systems, which I am using. I am thinking of someone running hundreds or thousands of systems. As I said, I find a solution, I always do. Ok, let me tell my last words: You do not need to care anymore. I showed up the problem, described it and for myself I got a solution. So: Not my problem. Thank you for the feedback. Best regards Hans P.S. I will stop talking this thematic on this list. Feel free to write to me directly.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
