On 2019-06-20, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think we (or at least I) must be missing some context here. For >> starters, this must be some specific group of teenagers. And I'm sure >> they're not given permission to take over running the whole TV station. >> >> Is this some specific educational environment? Or is it a TV station >> specifically intended to be run by and for teenagers? Something else? > Richard Hector (rich...@walnut.gen.nz), I am considering the case of > (production) systems on TV stations for general audiences, that is TV > stations that is watched by all audiences, not just teens. As long as > someone is aged 13 or older, he/she is teenager. The remaja user group
Normally the teenage category has both a lower and an upper limit, the latter being 19. > is for anyone that his/her age is 13 or older. My concern here is > whether giving teens full administrator privileges on those production > systems can be dangerous/vulnerable or not, in fact that psychologically > they are very unstable. > If you're giving your psychologically unstable remajas full administrative privileges you are effectively giving them root; sudo affords the ability to fine-tune the accorded rights in such a way as to limit the amount and nature of the havoc your adolescent sudoers may eventually raise (when and if they do go bonkers).
